<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Illustrations of future robots (1969)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pinktentacle.com/2010/01/illustrations-of-future-robots-1969/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pinktentacle.com/2010/01/illustrations-of-future-robots-1969/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 21:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DavidPhillipOster</title>
		<link>http://pinktentacle.com/2010/01/illustrations-of-future-robots-1969/#comment-451246</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidPhillipOster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktentacle.com/?p=5304#comment-451246</guid>
		<description>Take a look at http://www.google.com/search?q=da%20vinci%20surgical%20robot , it&#039;s kind of a cross between the multi-armed nanny robot, and the surgical robot, and it&#039;s real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=da%20vinci%20surgical%20robot" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=da%20vinci%20surgical%20robot</a> , it's kind of a cross between the multi-armed nanny robot, and the surgical robot, and it's real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soma36</title>
		<link>http://pinktentacle.com/2010/01/illustrations-of-future-robots-1969/#comment-449945</link>
		<dc:creator>soma36</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktentacle.com/?p=5304#comment-449945</guid>
		<description>Probably one of the better predictions from way back when! We are already making progress on no.1 and no.3 with nanotech is not so far fetched. The second one, well, have we just not found that getting a real warm body from a poor country or our own underprivileged ranks to do it instead is cheaper?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably one of the better predictions from way back when! We are already making progress on no.1 and no.3 with nanotech is not so far fetched. The second one, well, have we just not found that getting a real warm body from a poor country or our own underprivileged ranks to do it instead is cheaper?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back to the future &#171; MangaBlog</title>
		<link>http://pinktentacle.com/2010/01/illustrations-of-future-robots-1969/#comment-449824</link>
		<dc:creator>Back to the future &#171; MangaBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktentacle.com/?p=5304#comment-449824</guid>
		<description>[...] Tentacle has some cool illustrations of the robots of the future from a 1969 issue of Shonen Sunday. (Via The Manga [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tentacle has some cool illustrations of the robots of the future from a 1969 issue of Shonen Sunday. (Via The Manga [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Master Shake</title>
		<link>http://pinktentacle.com/2010/01/illustrations-of-future-robots-1969/#comment-449369</link>
		<dc:creator>Master Shake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 07:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktentacle.com/?p=5304#comment-449369</guid>
		<description>Because the wealthy nations that could be making such innovations are spending all their resources on wars. No one needs hundreds of millions of dollars - and in the 1960&#039;s only a few such people existed on the planet. Now there are thousands of people who have $100 million or more. They aren&#039;t interested in developing such technology. Their idea of fun is controlling the world and OWNING you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the wealthy nations that could be making such innovations are spending all their resources on wars. No one needs hundreds of millions of dollars - and in the 1960's only a few such people existed on the planet. Now there are thousands of people who have $100 million or more. They aren't interested in developing such technology. Their idea of fun is controlling the world and OWNING you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonus links for the month - The Anti-Boredom Team</title>
		<link>http://pinktentacle.com/2010/01/illustrations-of-future-robots-1969/#comment-449154</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonus links for the month - The Anti-Boredom Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktentacle.com/?p=5304#comment-449154</guid>
		<description>[...] Illustrations of Future Robots (pinktentacle.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Illustrations of Future Robots (pinktentacle.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2010-01-28 - Nerdcore</title>
		<link>http://pinktentacle.com/2010/01/illustrations-of-future-robots-1969/#comment-448522</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2010-01-28 - Nerdcore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 06:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktentacle.com/?p=5304#comment-448522</guid>
		<description>[...] Illustrations of future robots (1969) ::: Pink Tentacle (tags: Robots retrofuturism illustration) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Illustrations of future robots (1969) ::: Pink Tentacle (tags: Robots retrofuturism illustration) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rozarin</title>
		<link>http://pinktentacle.com/2010/01/illustrations-of-future-robots-1969/#comment-448422</link>
		<dc:creator>Rozarin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktentacle.com/?p=5304#comment-448422</guid>
		<description>This is the kind of future I can get behind. Why hasn&#039;t it happened??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the kind of future I can get behind. Why hasn't it happened??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

